无民则无国no people then no nation

“国有”由“民有”组合而成，没有“民有”，那来的“国有”? 妄图以“国有”来否定“民有”，那“国有”也空虚了。“国有”到那里去了?被“枪杆权力”吃掉了，被转移成了少数“私有”
“nationalization”had be assemble by“people have”,no the“people have”,where have the“nationalization”? attempt use as“nationalization”to negative“people have”,so “nationalization”have be empty. where is “nationalization”? it have be eat up, it have be transfer become to a few“private”